A new federal lawsuit has been filed against members of the Alabama Medical Cannabis Commission (AMCC), marking another significant development in the state’s evolving medical marijuana program.
According to a recent news release, the lawsuit was brought forward by Alabama Always, LLC, a company that applied for an integrated license under Alabama’s medical cannabis program. The lawsuit alleges that both commissioners and staff members of the AMCC violated the company’s First and Fourteenth Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution.
Alabama Always claims it was retaliated against by the commission for publicly criticizing how the AMCC was handling its licensing process. The company has previously raised concerns about the commission's transparency and adherence to state law. In the lawsuit, the plaintiff asserts that these criticisms led to unfair treatment and discrimination during the application process.
The First Amendment protects free speech, including the right to criticize public agencies. The Fourteenth Amendment ensures equal protection under the law. Alabama Always alleges that the commission’s actions violated both of these constitutional rights.
While specific details about the alleged retaliation were not disclosed in the initial news release, the lawsuit seeks compensatory damages, which could result in financial restitution if the court rules in the company's favor.
This legal action adds to growing scrutiny surrounding Alabama’s medical cannabis licensing process. Since its inception, the AMCC has faced numerous challenges, including delays, legal disputes, and allegations of inconsistent decision-making. Critics have pointed to a lack of transparency and fairness, especially as it relates to how licenses are awarded and how applicant evaluations are conducted.
Alabama Always is one of many companies vying for a limited number of licenses that would allow them to operate as integrated cannabis businesses—handling everything from cultivation to sales. With stakes this high, competition has been intense, and the legal environment surrounding the program continues to evolve.
At this time, AMCC officials have not issued a public response to the lawsuit. WVTM 13 News reported that they reached out for comment but have yet to receive a reply.
As the case progresses through the federal courts, it may have broader implications for how state agencies handle licensing, applicant criticism, and constitutional protections in highly regulated industries like cannabis.
Stay tuned for updates as more information becomes available.