Connecticut's Cannabis DUI Bill Sparks Debate
Since the legalization of cannabis in Connecticut in 2021, law enforcement has faced challenges in ensuring road safety. Officers have struggled with detecting and enforcing impaired driving laws related to cannabis use. Now, a proposed bill seeks to give police more authority to stop drivers suspected of being under the influence of cannabis—but not everyone agrees it's the right approach.
A Step Backward?
Advocates argue that the bill represents a step backward and fails to effectively address impaired driving. Melissa May, a medical marijuana patient who was prescribed cannabis after being hit by a car, believes the new measure unfairly targets responsible users.
“I have started a nonprofit, graduated college, got my child custody back, and launched a recovery organization,” May shared, highlighting how cannabis has played a positive role in her life.
She and others worry the bill could lead to over-policing rather than improving road safety.
The Proposed Legislation
The bill would allow police officers to pull over a driver if they observe suspected cannabis consumption and detect the odor of cannabis. However, critics like Evallise Correa argue that such an approach is too subjective.
“Smells can be misinterpreted, things can be confused for each other, and cannabis odor sticks around,” Correa explained. “You do not need to pull someone over for a joint to witness impairment. If a vehicle is swerving, police already have the authority to intervene.”
Concerns have also been raised about the potential for marginalized communities to be disproportionately affected by the new law.
Bipartisan Support
Despite the pushback, the bill has gained bipartisan support among legislators. Some believe it strikes a balance between ensuring fair enforcement and keeping roads safe.
“The smell alone isn’t enough,” one lawmaker acknowledged. “There are people who have been around cannabis but haven’t used it themselves. However, we all want drivers to be completely sober and in control.”
Republican lawmaker Greg Howard, a Stonington detective, emphasized the need for enforceable laws. “A law that police officers cannot enforce is not a law at all. It’s simply a suggestion, and that’s a public safety risk. If someone is actively impairing their ability to drive, police should stop them before more people get hurt.”
What’s Next?
The Judiciary Committee has until Friday, April 11th, to decide whether to advance the proposal. As the debate continues, questions remain about how best to balance road safety, personal freedom, and fair law enforcement.
What do you think? Should cannabis users be subjected to the same roadside testing measures as alcohol-impaired drivers? Let us know in the comments!
